Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,224
Bates v. Cronin et al
as 5:2024cv00604
Plaintiff: Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Defendant: Jeffery Cronin and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff: Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant: Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Charles McCrory
Defendant: John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner: John Lee Neal
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant: Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nix v. Hutton et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: Daric L Nix
Defendant: John Hutton and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Segal
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Nicholos Kirk Roberts
Defendant: Andrew John Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hornbuckle v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08006
Petitioner: John Hornbuckle
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caldwell v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00268
Plaintiff: Curtis Caldwell
Defendant: John Hamm, Dr. Thomas, Scotty Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?