Cases 1 - 10 of 2,600
Danny Valentine Shabazz v. Chris Bruce, et al
as 24-1919
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, JEFF FLYNN and others
SMITH v. 299 N FEDERAL MASTER, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE SMITH
Defendant:
299 N FEDERAL MASTER, LLC, WHG PAYROLL, LLC, WURZAK HOTEL GROUP MARK LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NASH, JR. v. SOHO STUDIO, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv06016
Plaintiff:
LARRY NASH, JR.
Defendant:
SOHO STUDIO, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
GIANNATTASIO v. AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05854
Plaintiff:
TARRA GIANNATTASIO
Defendant:
AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC, JOHN DOES (1-5) and ABC CORP (6-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
STEWART et al v. TUCKER FAMILY SUPPORTS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEWART and DANIEL SIMON
Defendant:
TUCKER FAMILY SUPPORTS, INC., JADE TUCKER and JOHN TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, JEFF FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MARTIN v. METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS et al
as 2:2024cv05648
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Defendant:
METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
REDA v. ACADEMY SPINE & PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05445
Plaintiff:
GABRIELA REDA
Defendant:
ACADEMY SPINE & PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC, JOHN CINTINEO and LENORE CINTINEO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BARRETT v. KONICA MINOLTA EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN et al
as 2:2024cv05067
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARRETT
Defendant:
KONICA MINOLTA EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN, ITS ADMINISTRATOR, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
