Cases 11 - 20 of 4,312
Timm v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
John E Timm
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirksey v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Daniel Cushing, K Grabowksi, Officer Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Raven Anderson
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan v. West Allis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
John Sloan
Defendant:
West Allis Police Department, Cpt Evenson, Sgt Baumgart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Foster, Eric v. Carver County Health and Human Services
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Eric John Foster
Defendant:
Carver County Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
