Cases 1 - 10 of 698
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Angela Johnson
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adams Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilkes
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Johnson (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Randy Steward
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Obechang et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jon Lenoska Johnson
Defendant:
Kristin Obechang, Chandler Caldwell, William Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson, Joseph Michael Willoughby, Jonathan W Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Randy Andrial Steward
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
