Cases 1 - 10 of 1,600
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and N Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleeman v. Johnson Bros Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gary D Fleeman
Defendant:
Johnson Bros Corporation and Joe Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
M Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Gedi et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Keonna Johnson
Defendant:
Muhyadin Gedi and Loadex Ltd Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
