Cases 1 - 10 of 5,600
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03852
Plaintiff:
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC and THE BALDWIN GROUP COLLEAGUE, INC.
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bays et al v. Rapid Action, LLC
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Bays, Courtney Bobinger, Cierra Daniels and others
Defendant:
Rapid Action, LLC doing business as RapidStaff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bradley v. Tritt et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr
Defendant:
Kyle Tritt, Joseph Beahm, Jesse Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
