Cases 1 - 10 of 373
Trejo v. Fair et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Alberto Trejo
Defendant:
K. Fair and Arnaldo Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paw v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
April Paw
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguayo v. Peters et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Bertha Aguayo
Defendant:
C Peters and Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olaiya v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Temitope Olaiya
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Keith Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Chevelle K Hunte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettaway v. Butler et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jermaine Pettaway
Defendant:
Butler, K. Henderson and Sergent Omega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Harrison
Defendant:
Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Posey et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Seron K. Smith
Defendant:
Captain Posey, Captain Nolan, Lt. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
