Cases 21 - 30 of 499
ARMSTRONG v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv05125
Defendant:
MS. ANGIE, SERGEANT CHARD, OFFICER GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff:
QUADIR ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2020cv03183
Defendant:
JENNIFER FARESTAD, ANTHONY THOMAS, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC HINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTTS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2019cv21635
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA BUTTS
Defendant:
WILLIAM HAUCK, WILLIAM ANDERSON, [FNU] BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF DONNA BUTTS v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2019cv21695
Defendant:
ADMIN. WILLIAM ANDERSON, [FNU] RICHARD, GARY LANIGAN and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF DONNA BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv21695
Plaintiff:
Donna Butts
Defendant:
Sarah Davis, William Hauck, [FNU] Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rene Edwards v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 19-3857
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAMS, Senior Corrections Officer (FNU), SCO I. SAMPSON, JOYNER, Senior Corrections Officer (FNU) and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, Warden/Administrator, individually, and in their official capacities and GARY M. LANIGAN, Warden/Administrator, individually, and in their official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENE D. EDWARDS
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Aruanno v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 19-3802
Respondent:
GARY LANIGAN and STEVEN JOHNSON
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Not Yet Classified:
WILLIAM J. MARTINI
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 19-3183
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, GOVERNOR, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Not Yet Classified:
STANLEY JUDSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
