Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Clervrain et al v. Rosado et al
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Medgine Sarah Jean and Brandako, Inc.
Defendant:
Rossana Rosado, Emanuel Cleaver, Sam Grawes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rajapakse v. Shaw
as 1:2020cv10473
Defendant:
Sey Farth Shaw, Robert Szyba, Seyfarth Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha D. Rajapakse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanigan v. Saul
as 7:2020cv09705
Plaintiff:
Terrence R. Lanigan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aucoin et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11803
Plaintiff:
John Simadis, Evelyn Torres, Edward Springer and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Adams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11493
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cruciata, Timothy Branan, John Scanlon and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Amadei et al v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv05967
Plaintiff:
Kelley Amadei, Carola Cassaro, Laura Cucullu and others
Defendant:
Thomas Decker, John Does 1 and 2, Elaine Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lanigan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 7:2016cv07407
Plaintiff:
John Lanigan
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lanigan v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv04180
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Maryann Lanigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LaFrance v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv01158
Plaintiff:
Kimberly LaFrance and LaFrance
Defendant:
James J. Buettgen, F. Lane Cardwell, Kevin T. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
