Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hutton v. U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Defendant:
Aliba Larkin, Bess Poar, Cantia Ferrum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald H Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bass v. Larsen et al
as 1:2024cv02182
Not Yet Classified:
Sam Rainwaters
Plaintiff:
William Bass
Defendant:
Robert Edwin Larsen, Kivi Bros Trucking, Inc. and Derek J. Kivi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bass v. Larsen et al
as 2:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
William Bass
Defendant:
Robert Edwin Larsen, Kivi Bros Trucking, Inc. and Derek J. Kivi
Not Yet Classified:
Sam Rainwaters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Sheriff Steve Reams and Sheriff f/n/u Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ball v. Larsen-Ball (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Gordon Ball
Defendant:
Marn Larsen-Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen et al v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC
as 3:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Nigel Larsen , Susan Larsen and Larsen Matthew
Defendant:
Bass Pro Shops, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen-Ball v. Cooper Vision, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Marn Larsen-Ball
Defendant:
Cooper Vision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Gilmer v. T. R. Franklin, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00969
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gilmer
Defendant:
T. R. Franklin, Inc., Jason Sheer, Kyle McPhee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen v. Martin
as 3:2010cv00433
Plaintiff:
Johan Bjork Larsen
Defendant:
Tyler Charles Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starkey v. Richards et al
as 3:2010cv00921
Plaintiff:
Randy Starkey
Defendant:
David L. Richards, Minor Miracle Productions, LLC, David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
