Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LUJAN v. Sensio Company (US) Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
BONNIE LUJAN
Defendant:
Sensio Company (US) Inc. and Sensio Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keaton et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12326
Plaintiff:
KAREN KEATON, Magali Colon, Josephine Kopik and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Acosta et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11810
Plaintiff:
Kenny Tin, So Chun Kwong, Yue Qin Lu Chen and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court v. U.S. Congress et al
as 1:2016cv01490
Defendant:
U.S. Congress, Ben Sasse, David Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Grand Jury, Sovereigns of the Court
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0101 Ethics in Government Act
Lujan Ulloa v. Peacock Paint Supplies Incorporated et al
as 1:2016cv06774
Plaintiff:
Angel R. Lujan Ulloa
Defendant:
Peacock Paint Supplies Incorporated , R & A Painting Ltd. , Egor Aronin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lujan v. Greater Omentum et al
as 1:2015cv00655
Plaintiff:
Nayavi Lujan
Defendant:
G.O. & B. LLC, Corey Lawrence and Greater Omentum and Lawrence Harlem Foods LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Roberts v. Bexar County Sherriff's Department et al
as 3:2013cv00916
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Roberts
Defendant:
Bexar County Sherriff's Department, Jesus Ochoa, Ray Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Nandkisure et al
as 1:2011cv09329
Plaintiff:
Douglas Thompson
Defendant:
Shawn Nandkisure, Joel Espinoza, Angel Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
