Cases 1 - 10 of 2,008
Tiger Correctional Services Inc v. Glathar
as 3:2024cv00075
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Walker v. Turner
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jean Walker
Defendant:
John M Turner, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
M Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FCCI Insurance Company v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
FCCI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christopher M Bennett, Michelle Bennett and Master Roof and Remodel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meisenbach v. BEI Precision Systems and Space Company Inc Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 4:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Linda M Meisenbach
Defendant:
BEI Precision Systems and Space Company Inc Long Term Disability Plan, USAble Life and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Broady v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daryl M Broady
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poindexter v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie A Poindexter
Defendant:
Kim M Smith, Cristi R Beaumont, John C Threet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
