Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ferreira v. M&P Fishing Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv10648
Plaintiff:
Aniceto P Ferreira
Defendant:
M&P Fishing Corp., F/V The Fisherman and Mario Ribeiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
as 1:2021fp00868
Plaintiff:
Maria Peter, M. P., Julika Berger and others
Defendant:
Susan Diane Wojcicki, William Henry Cates, Stephane Bancel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Docarmo v. M & P Fishing Corporation
as 1:2020cv11475
Plaintiff:
Valdemar Docarmo
Defendant:
M & P Fishing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Feloni v. Coco et al
as 1:2016cv12178
Plaintiff:
John Feloni
Defendant:
Peter M. Coco, Claire Coco, Frank A. Cieri and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. $50,405.00 US Currency et al
as 1:2012cv00451
Defendant:
$1,120.00 US Currency, $50,405.00 US Currency, Glock GMBH 23 Pistol and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Farlow et al v. Desarrolladora del Norte S. en C. por A., S.E.
as 3:2012cv01819
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Farlow , Deborah Price , A. F. and others
Defendant:
Desarrolladora del Norte S. en C. por A., S.E. , Your Entertainment, Inc. and MAPFRE PRAICO Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv40073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Palmer v. American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv11206
Plaintiff:
Franklin Palmer
Defendant:
American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc. and M P Leasing Corp.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
B. et al
as 3:2009cv30090
Plaintiff:
J. W. B., M. P. B., D. B. and others
Defendant:
Burkhart, Pizzanelli, P.C., Financial Counselors, LLC, Richard F. Burkhart and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
