Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rodriguez-Jimenez v. DynaCom Management, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
Luis M. Rodriguez-Jimenez
Defendant:
DynaCom Management, LLC, Mland Maintenance LLC,, DynaCom Management, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Esco v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2022cv02324
Plaintiff:
Terrell Esco
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Matt Segovia, Raquel Altruez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv06485
Plaintiff:
Patrice M Rodriguez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rodriguez v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Rodriguez
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rodriguez et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
as 1:2019cv05224
Defendant:
Astrazeneca L.P., Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., Bristol-Meyer Squibb Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra M Rodriguez and Diego A Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv01285
Defendant:
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Patrice M Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hill et al v. Harrington #L13 et al
as 1:2018cv05592
Defendant:
Robert W. Purvis, John A. Gartner, Parole Agent Walls #L77 and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Hill and Charles Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Soo Line Railroad Co
as 1:2018cv05231
Plaintiff:
Jose M Rodriguez
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
