Cases 1 - 10 of 55
A. et al v. Independence Blue Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mark A., Tracy A. and M.A.
Defendant:
Independence Blue Cross, QCC Insurance Company and Independence Personal Choice PPO Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
K.A., et al v. Board of Mosquero Municipal Schools, et al
as 23-2182
Plaintiff / Appellee:
K.A. and R.A., As Next of Kin and Next Friend of M.A.
Defendant / Appellant:
T.T., individually, under color of state law
Defendant:
THE BOARD OF MOSQUERO MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS, a local school Board
M.A. et al v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
M.A. and A.A.
Defendant:
CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and Eisner LLP Group Life Medical and LTD Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Porter v. Regents of the University of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Whitney Porter, M.A. and Whitney Porter
Defendant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, a body corporate, VENKATESHWAR VENKAT REDDY, Venkateshwar Reddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DeCory v. Laney et al
as 5:2021cv00953
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory
Defendant:
Lt. O Laney and Lt. K Mangus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Wiggins v. Stancil
as 19-1408
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD WIGGINS
Respondent / Appellee:
M.A. STANCIL, Warden
Little v. Stancil
as 19-1307
Respondent / Appellee:
M.A. STANCIL
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYHEIM LITTLE
Hockley v. Stencil
as 1:2019cv02331
Petitioner:
Marquice Hockley
Respondent:
M.A. Stencil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
