Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00053
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Motley v. USA
as 5:2015cv00162
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles Albert Motley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hearld v. Haney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00119
Plaintiff: Steven Lynn Hearld
Defendant: Steve Haney, Randy White, John Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruszewski v. Motley Rice, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00046
Defendant: Motley Rice, LLC and Provost Umphrey Law Firm, LLP
Plaintiff: Donna Bruszewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Depp v. Motley
as 1:2010cv00137
Petitioner: Nicholas L. Depp
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson et al v. Motley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00105
Plaintiff: Frederick C. Jackson and United States of America
Defendant: John Motley and Wesley W. Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flanders v. Motley
as 6:2010cv00129
Petitioner: Robert Flanders
Respondent: John T. Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Profitt v. McDonald's Rape Case et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00337
Plaintiff: Mike Profitt
Defendant: McDonald's Rape Case, Samantha Melo, Oprah Winfrey and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Conley v. Motley
as 7:2010cv00045
Petitioner: Justin Keith Conley
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Depp v. Motley
as 5:2010cv00113
Petitioner: Nicholas L. Depp
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?