Cases 1 - 10 of 16,909
Banzai Advisory Group, LLC et al v. The Founders Fund VII, LP et al
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Banzai Advisory Group, LLC, Banzai Capital Partners, LLC, Neugebauer Family Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant:
The Founders Fund VII, LP, The Founders Fund VII Principals Fund, LP, The Founders Fund VII Entrepreneurs Fund, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garces v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-3166
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Defendant:
M. GAMBOA, KERN KLARK, D. HERNANDEZ and others
United States v. Manuel Menchaca
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Menchaca, also known as Jose Hector Rodriguez, also known as Rooster
Mendiola v. United States of America
as 24-3218
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL MENDIOLA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Ulibarri
as 24-2080
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANUEL JONATHAN ULIBARRI, AKA Manuel Ulibarri
Villeda-Gonzales v. Garland
as 24-3137
Petitioner:
OSCAR MANUEL VILLEDA-GONZALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Manuel Arsenio Jacquez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Manuel Arsenio Jacquez
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff Department, Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Rodriguez, et al v. Imperial Brands, PLC., et al
as 24-11487
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, MARIA RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO RAMON FORNS and others
Defendant:
IMPERIAL BRANDS, PLC., CORPORACION HABANOS, S.A., WPP, PLC. and others
Culbreth v. Manuel et al
as 7:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
Kareem H. Culbreth
Defendant:
Manuel and Sgt. Brahm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Costanzo
as 24-1310
Defendant:
JOHN COSTANZO, JR., MANUEL RECIO, Sealed Defendant 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
