Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Manuel v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10175
Plaintiff:
Annette Manuel
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Manuel v. Parrett et al
as 1:2023cv13232
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Manuel
Defendant:
Khalid L Parrett, United States Department of Justice and USPS Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Then v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2023cv12147
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Rodriguez Then
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10644
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lucero et al v. Coppinger et al
as 1:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V., Robert Blanchette, James Williams and others
Defendant:
Kevin Coppinger, George Glynos and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Venmo, LLC
as 1:2023cv10048
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V.
Defendant:
Venmo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrade v. Divris
as 4:2022cv12237
Petitioner:
Manuel Andrade
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrade v. Divris
as 1:2022cv12237
Petitioner:
Manuel Andrade
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
