Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Al-'Owhali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Al-'Owhali
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv02108
Defendant:
Mrs. Gonzales, Tiffany J. Preston, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Mason Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MATEVOUSIAN et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Defendant:
L. BATCHELOR, MERENDINO, C. ZEHNER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, COLETTE S. PETERS, STEVE KALLIS, Warden and others
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hamrick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Rodney Curtis Hamrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Andre Matevousian, Barb Von Blanckensee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Srader v. United States, et al
as 24-3001
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. SRADER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, FNU LNU (1) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
