Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Mays v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv10038
Plaintiff:
Brian Mays
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Welltok, Inc. and Premier Health Partners d/b/a Premier Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
May v. May et al
as 4:2023cv40099
Plaintiff:
Yarnell May
Defendant:
Brenda May and Laya Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11557
Defendant:
Orzon Rubio, Bristol County District Attorney's Office, Bristol County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Evans Emons Stroman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Walgreens et al
as 1:2023cv11430
Plaintiff:
Emmanuela May
Defendant:
Walgreens and Steven Bacon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
May v. Covidien Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv11810
Plaintiff:
Timothy May
Defendant:
Covidien Ltd., Covidien, Inc., Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Cahoon et al
as 1:2022cv10304
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Lieutenant Cahoon, Superintendent, Peter Monteiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berlik et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv11723
Plaintiff:
Sacha Berlik, Berit Block, Paul Dean and others
Defendant:
Michael Baker, Edward Crawley, Jeffrey Bussgang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
