Cases 1 - 10 of 205
May v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Santino May
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. d/b/a Walmart Supercenter #305 and John Does I - X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Alexander v. Cox et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jamiah Alexander
Defendant:
Fletcher Cox, Teresa Luckett, Pam May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. Duff et al
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
Debra Mays Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Duff, Steven Cunningham, Bruce Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
United States of America v. Mays
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keenan Mays
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reed v. Atkins et al
as 4:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antwan Reed
Defendant:
Docterance Atkins, May Etta Trucking LLC, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury Venue
May v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Cedric Perrid Rashad May
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Richard Bynum, Valerie Wells and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Mays
as 3:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daja Mays
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Lyles v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Sonny Lyles
Defendant:
Dale May doing business as The Boat Doc and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
