Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Tolbert v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shantal Tolbert
Defendant:
Willye Mai King, Richelieu Dennis, Yende Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
May et al v. Martin Fein Interest Ltd. et al
as 5:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Katie Nelson, Crabtree Apartments Associates II LLC, Brenda Hubbard and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Dolores May and Raymond Earl May, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
May v. University Health Systems of Eastern North Carolina, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Jane Doe, The City of Greenville, NC, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Nina May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyatt et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Defendant:
Jeff May, Jack Van Duncan, Christopher Stockton and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Barret, Marcus Hyatt and Ashley Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Mays v. Stowe
as 3:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
Milton Mays
Defendant:
Deborah Stowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOOTH et al v. CITY OF KING, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BOOTH and ROCKING RODS, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF KING, NORTH CAROLINA , KING, NORTH CAROLINA, POLICE DEPARTMENT and PAULA MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
as 3:2016cv00203
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
Plaintiff:
Amy Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
