Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McQueen v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2025cv00145
Plaintiff:
Marcus D McQueen
Defendant:
Rosalynn Wilson, Curtis Washington and Dee Dee Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv01818
Defendant:
Ebony Tucker, Lil Mez, Paficia Riggs and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00769
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Lt. Chandler, Officer Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv01613
Defendant:
Shadone C Washington, Ebony Tucker, Terrylynn Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Wilson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00634
Defendant:
Curtis Washington, Rosalynn Wilson and Dee Dee Wilson
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Limestone Correctional Facility (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00614
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Marbury et al
as 5:2024cv01321
Defendant:
Chiquita Marbury and Corey LNU
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Lamar
as 1:2024cv00346
Petitioner:
Roger McQueen
Respondent:
David Lamar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
