Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Medina v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01135
Petitioner:
Nativida Mercado Medina
Respondent:
Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tepole v. VL Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Tepole
Defendant:
VL Construction, LLC and Valente Lambarria-Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bashel v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bhuwan Bashel
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Martha Medina-Maltes
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Goad v. Cullman County Detention Center et al
as 5:2020cv01716
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center, Lt Baleew, Deputy Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01085
Plaintiff:
Carlos Medina
Defendant:
Walter J. Wood, Sr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pate v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bowman, Kenneth Knight, David Webb and others
Defendant:
Walter J. Wood, Sr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Medina v. Woods (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00858
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Plaintiff:
Carlos Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sevilla v. Kal Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01910
Defendant:
Purple Onion Inc, The, Purple Onion and Bar and Grill LLC, The, Kal Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Medina Sevilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Martinez et al v. Gaby Food Services Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01930
Plaintiff:
Jesus Martinez and Francisco Salas
Defendant:
Gaby Food Services Inc and Roberto Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
