Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite et al v. City of Bainbridge Island et al
as 3:2022cv05491
Plaintiff:
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite, Lee Rosenbaum, Janice Pyke and others
Defendant:
The City of Bainbridge Island, Kolby Medina, Morgan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ramirez Medina v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez Medina
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Camacho v. PeopleConnect Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Camacho
Defendant:
PeopleConnect, Inc., TruthFinder LLC and PeopleConnect Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camacho v. PeopleConnect Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Camacho
Defendant:
PeopleConnect, Inc., Intelius LLC and PeopleConnect Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
