Cases 1 - 10 of 285
Mohamed et al v. Blinken et al
as 0:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Saleh Samir
Petitioner:
Nafiso Hurshe Mohamed
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Rena Bitter and Margaret Whitman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alhussein v. Telephone and Cabel Company et al
as 0:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
Musab Mohamed Alhussein
Defendant:
Telephone and Cabel Company, Cabel and Wireless and AT&T Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01723
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Alhussein v. Elkhart County
as 0:2024cv01552
Plaintiff:
Musab Mohamed Salih Alhussein
Defendant:
Elkhart County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Lasley v. Neumann et al
as 0:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Edward Evan Lasley
Defendant:
Neumann, Mohamed, Rice County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
