Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
White v. City of Corrigan etal
as 9:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. White
Defendant:
City of Corrigan, Celestino Molina, Darrell G. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Molina-Uribe v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00091
Petitioner:
Felipe Molina-Uribe
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zapata v. USA
as 4:2022cv00705
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Molina Zapata
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Cromey, Jr. v. Bingham et al.
as 6:2022cv00210
Defendant:
Michael Guisto Leone, Matt Bingham, Jacob Putman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Guisto Cromey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. McKinney Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ellison
Defendant:
McKinney Police Department, J Stephen Donaldson, Aaron Magallanez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gomez v. Camaro Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gomez
Defendant:
Camaro Inc. doing business as Frutilandia Meat Market #8, Maria Molina and Carmen Gallo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Molina v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 4:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Plaintiff:
Tomasa Molina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arenas et al v. Sandford Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ashland Arenas , Jason Villareal , Cedric Camp and others
Defendant:
Western Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
