Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Recinos v. Dr Gessell Orthodontics et al
as 3:2023cv06087
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Dr Gessell Orthodontics, Molina + Provider One Insurance, Department of Social Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Ramey
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ramey v. Molina Healthcare Inc
as 3:2023cv05768
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Ramey
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Molina v. City of West Richland et al
as 4:2023cv05012
Plaintiff:
Eric Molina
Defendant:
City of West Richland, Ben Majetich, Duane Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rios v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05931
Petitioner:
Luciano Molina Rios
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05245
Petitioner:
Luciano Molina Rios
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rapp et al v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05800
Plaintiff:
John Rapp, Megan F Wabnitz and Judith Rapp
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Kitsap County, Gary Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Rios v. Uttecht
as 3:2019cv06112
Petitioner:
Luciano Molina Rios
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
