Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hoffman v. Rule
as 4:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Monte Hoffman
Respondent:
Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoffman v. Rule
as 1:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Monte G Hoffman
Respondent:
Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hoffman v. USA
as 4:2020cv00163
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Monte G Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Montes v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company and Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Moises Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Wasden et al
as 1:2014cv00493
Plaintiff:
Lawny Browning
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden, Brent Reinke, Tim Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Animal Legal Defense Fund et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Animal Legal Defense Fund , People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals , American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho and others
Defendant:
C.L. Butch Otter and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolf v. Otter et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Hunter et al
as 4:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kesl Hunter, Monte Hunter, Wayne Hale and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
