Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morton v. Wells Fargo/ASC et al
as 3:2019cv01120
Defendant:
Shapiro & Ingle, LLP and Wells Fargo/ASC
Plaintiff:
Shauneille E. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Whitley et al
as 3:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Paul Walwyn, Dee Gay, John W. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Morton (TV2)
as 1:2016cv00361
Plaintiff:
Precious M. Favors
Defendant:
Stoney Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Coleman et al
as 3:2016cv00677
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones and Deanna Lack
Defendant:
Kent Coleman , Henry Fincher , Patricia Heim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02448
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee , Jesse Sandlin, James Kirkwood and others
Plaintiff:
Detria Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strong et al v. The Tennessee Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance Registry of Election Finance et al
as 3:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Williamson Strong , Sarah Barnard , Jim Cheney and others
Defendant:
The Tennessee Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance Registry of Election Finance , Tom Lawless , Patricia Heim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood v. MCG Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood
Defendant:
MCG Mortgage, Inc. , Cenlar , FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
