Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Heghmann v. The Republican National Committee et al
as 2:2017cv00411
Plaintiff: Robert A. Heghmann
Defendant: The Republican National Committee, Morton Blackwell, Cynthia Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dougherty v Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.
as 1:2017cv00302
Plaintiff: Robert W. Dougherty
Defendant: Dana Lawhorne, Schuler, Sergeant Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Morton et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff: Billy Curry
Defendant: Morton and S. W. Harman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. USA
as 3:2016cv00453
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kelvin B. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Bank of the Commonwealth v. Woodard et al
as 2:2014cv00471
Plaintiff: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Bank of the Commonwealth
Defendant: Edward J. Woodard, Jr., Emory Carlton Bowyer, Laurence C. Fentriss and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Combo v. Gooch et al
as 2:2014cv00446
Plaintiff: Calvin Bernard Combo
Defendant: B. Gooch and J.T. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00841
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Morton Thompson v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00179
Plaintiff: Donyelle Pleshette Morton Thompson
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00059
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wan v. Crawford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01473
Petitioner: Menghua Wan
Respondent: Jeffrey Crawford, Thomas Homan, Matthew Munroe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?