Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Morton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01304
Plaintiff:
Jack Morton Morton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Department of Corrections, Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandifer v. Sparks et al
as 1:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lance Thomas Sandifer
Defendant:
Ashley Sparks, Sean Brantley, Ben Killingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Vanderbilt
as 3:2013cv01012
Plaintiff:
Tracy Morton
Defendant:
Vanderbilt University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Wilson et al v. Delk et al
as 2:2013cv02667
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Wilson and Gena R. Kilgore-Wilson
Defendant:
Paulette J. Delk, George W. Emerson, Jr., Robert Lee Webber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
David Hill and Shirley Hill
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC , Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Henry Steward, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Morton
as 2:2013mc00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Morris L Morton
Morton v. Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. d/b/a Sears Home Services
as 2:2012cv02941
Plaintiff:
Howard D. Morton
Defendant:
Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. d/b/a Sears Home Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morton v. E. Kenneth Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02882
Plaintiff:
Cindy Morton
Defendant:
E. Kenneth Wall & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
