Cases 1 - 10 of 1,352
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nadel v. Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv11315
Plaintiff:
Craig P. Nadel
Defendant:
Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company and Davies Life & Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Riley et al v. City of Boston Fire Department
as 1:2024cv11314
Plaintiff:
James P Riley and Boston Firefighters IAFF Local 718
Defendant:
City of Boston Fire Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Goldstein v. ONSite Service Corporation
as 1:2024cv11295
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant:
ONSite Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Carney et al
as 1:2024cv11184
Plaintiff:
Deric M Thompson
Defendant:
James P. Carney and Bernardi Auto Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
D'Amario v. Sturdy et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Arthur D'Amario, III
Defendant:
Mark E. Sturdy and Kyle P Heagney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
