Cases 41 - 50 of 5,981
Perez Urias v. Garland
as 24-1411
Petitioner:
SAMUEL FAUSTINO PEREZ URIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Puerto Cerrato, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1342
Petitioner:
DAGOBERTO PUERTO CERRATO, ISIS YASIRI ROMERO PEREZ, KNETH JAFET PUERTO ROMERO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. Lorman, et al.
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE PEREZ and Lisa Marie Belyew
Defendant:
MATT BEAUCHAMP, LARRY LORMAN and COLUSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
J.S.S. v. Northern Oregon Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
J. S. S.
Defendant:
Northern Oregon Corrections and Josue Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz Gutierrez et al v. Frederick et al
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jorge Diaz Gutierrez, Jorge Ruiz Perez, Sandi Diaz Lozano and others
Defendant:
James Joseph Frederick and Laboratory Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Genice Irene Perez v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
GENICE IRENE PEREZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Darleen Perez v. Keenan and Associates
as 2:2024cv01738
Plaintiff:
Darleen Perez
Defendant:
Keenan & Associates and Keenan and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Maria G. De Perez v. Medtronic, Inc et al
as 8:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Medtronic, Inc
Plaintiff:
Maria G. De Perez
Defendant:
Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
