Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Perez v. Mulrooney
as 2:2017cv02007
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Gregory Edward Mulrooney
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Perez et al v. Vazquez Commercial Clean Up, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02637
Plaintiff:
Crisanto Perez and Arabela Zacarias
Defendant:
Vazquez Commercial Clean Up, LLC and Guadalupe Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.,
as 2:2016cv02502
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Leon et al v. Stanley Smith Drywall, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02083
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Leon , Francisco Lachino , Dolores Gallardo and others
Defendant:
Stanley Smith Drywall, Inc., Michael Wray and Stanley Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Perez v. Futhey
as 2:2016mc00003
Respondent:
Malcolm Futhey
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sanchez-Zamora et al v. Los Matas Mexican Restaurant Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez-Zamora , Casey Van Dorl , Maria Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Los Matas Mexican Restaurant Inc., El Mezcalito, Inc., El Mezcal Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Bond et al
as 1:2014cv01339
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Tonya Fisher, Cedrick Tyus and others
Plaintiff:
Marcello Hernandez Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Happy Mexican, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02248
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Happy Mexican, LLC and Rafael Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Union University v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2014cv01079
Plaintiff:
Union University
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas E. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perez v. Gaines et al
as 1:2013cv01268
Defendant:
Ben J Gaines and NEW GENERATIONS EMPLOYEE SAVINGS & RETIREMENT PLAN
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
