Cases 1 - 10 of 356
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk et al v. City of Port Lavaca et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Dolores Polk and Daniel Polk
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, John Smith Officer # 1, John Smith Officer # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Polk v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Nelson Alexander Polk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk Mechanical Company LLC v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Polk Mechanical Company LLC
Defendant:
United States of America Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Guzman
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
James Lee Polk
Defendant:
A Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
