Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Henry v. Prospera Financial Services, Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01537
Plaintiff:
Patrick C Henry, III
Defendant:
Prospera Financial Services, Inc, Pyle Financial Services, Inc, Pyle Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Pyles v. ZF North America Inc
as 6:2020cv03497
Defendant:
ZF North America Inc
Plaintiff:
Felicia Pyles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Reid v. White et al
as 6:2017cv02695
Defendant:
Henry J Mimms, John Vandermosten, Robert F Simm and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Reid, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pyles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2014cv04080
Plaintiff:
Christel Hunter Pyles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Marilyn Williams et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02376
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams , Janice Johnson , Debbie Kashima and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Imelda Diaz et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02341
Plaintiff:
Imelda Diaz , Norberdina Barnes , Sundra Ironshield and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Long v. Floyd et al
as 5:2012cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jerome Long
Defendant:
Joel Floyd, James C Williams, Barbar Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. McCall et al
as 8:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Latimer
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Karen C Ratigan, C Victor Pyle, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. McCall et al
as 8:2010cv02829
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Latimer
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Karen C Ratigan, Larry R Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
