Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Ngiendo v. Young Men's Christian Association of the North
as 0:2024cv02454
Defendant:
YMCA and Young Men's Christian Association of the North
Plaintiff:
Quinn Ngiendo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Ngiendo v. Public Storage, Inc.
as 0:2024cv02453
Plaintiff:
Quinn Ngiendo
Defendant:
Public Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ngiendo v. Masiti et al
as 0:2024cv01485
Plaintiff:
Quinn Ngiendo
Defendant:
Salvation Army Northern Division, Hemlata H. Masiti, Hemlata H. Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Quinn v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
Robert Quinn
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Thompson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
James Charles Thompson, III
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jeff Titus, G. Besonen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv03057
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen DeMotett, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen DeMotett, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv02739
Plaintiff:
Donna Quinn
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02728
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Mark Reichel, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
