Cases 1 - 10 of 28
FILED IN ERROR
as 6:2023cv00884
Claimant:
Municipality of Mariana and Unknown Persons
Material Witne:
Marcus Philip Randolph
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Estate of Gabrielle Medina v. Samuels, et al
as 22-1329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF GABRIELLE MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER ROSS SAMUELS, ELLE HEEG MILLER, KIMBERLY RETALLACK and others
Tanner v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv02340
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tanner
Defendant:
Zachary Campbell, Jill M. Mannon, Alla Shkolnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arndt v. Peery et al
as 5:2021cv00584
Defendant:
Peggy Kates, Lisa Epperson, Gessica Sewell and others
Plaintiff:
David Arndt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. University of Kansas Medical Center et al
as 2:2020cv02600
Defendant:
Usman Latif, John M. Sojka and University of Kansas Medical Center
Plaintiff:
LaTreissa D. Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina v. Samuels et al
as 1:2020cv01443
Defendant:
Leto Quarles, Jennifer Samuels, Amy Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Gabrielle Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Susan V. Cespedes, The et al v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01291
Defendant:
Randolph Maul, Bill Elder, Angela Rupe-Lippert and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cespedes and Estate of Susan V. Cespedes, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubert v. Central New Mexico Community College et al
as 1:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Laura Aubert
Defendant:
Randall Crandall, Rudy Garcia, Craig Venderploeg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
