Cases 1 - 10 of 106
EVANS v. RUTLEDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EVANS
Defendant:
MELISSA RUTLEDGE, BRYAN VANDERVORT and ISAAC RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMES v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, COOPER, RANDY PERCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Vanihel et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
William R. Grimes
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, Mrs. Cooper, Randy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Larry Randolph
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORAN v. RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
ISSAC RANDOLPH, CARLA COAKLEY, MADISEN GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Dante D Guy and Dante Guy
Defendant:
Brian English, M Morson and Isaac Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
