Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Luke v. Ft. Dodge Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Scott Randolph Luke
Defendant:
Ft. Dodge Correctional Facility, North Central Correctional Facility, Kris Karberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luke v. Department of Human Service - Cerro Gordo et al
as 3:2023cv03011
Plaintiff:
Scott Randolph Luke
Defendant:
Department of Human Service - Cerro Gordo, Families First Counseling, Samantha Weigmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Death)
Luke v. Iowa
as 3:2023cv03012
Petitioner:
Scott Randolph Luke
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Siemionko et al
as 2:2021cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jaylon Randolph
Defendant:
Steven Siemionko, City of Asbury and Asbury Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark et al v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Linda Jepsen, Glen Josang, Holly Detlef and others
Defendant:
Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0159
Clark et al v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Adeline Clark , Amanda Arana , Amy Jo Dolan and others
Defendant:
Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Randolph v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00507
Petitioner:
Excell James Randolph
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randolph v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00054
Petitioner:
Excell James Randolph
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ross v. Langley et al
as 4:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ross
Defendant:
Linda Langley, Meredith Baker and Chad Squires
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Menard Inc
as 3:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Freeman
Defendant:
Menard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
