Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Randolph v. City of Baldwin Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KENNINGTON v. HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC et al
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC and DONALD RANDOLPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
JAMIE KENNINGTON, JUAN URBINA, JR. and DARREN JASKULSKI
Perry v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv01239
Defendant:
Officer Randolph, Pretrial of Cobb County, Dr. Richards and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Perry, Brenden Perry and Marc Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Edge
as 2:2019cv00028
Petitioner:
Randolph Baker
Respondent:
Mr. Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randolph v. City of Baldwin, Georgia et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA v. BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA, et al
as 5:2018cv00471
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, RANDOLPH COUNTY GEORGIA, SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA, DR MONIQUE Y TATE, LAMAR PERRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Chu v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2018cv05323
Plaintiff:
Randolph Chu
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matrix Residential v. Osborne
as 1:2018cv04928
Plaintiff:
Matrix Residential
Defendant:
Terrell Osborne
Petitioner:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Speer v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv04203
Petitioner:
Randolph Speer
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
