Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Green v. USA
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Leneil Randolph Green
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LAMBERT v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Respondent:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Reginald Randolph Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Randolph v. USA
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02275
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Wright v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wright and Thomas Randolph Wright
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galarza v. Taylor
as 5:2023ct03197
Plaintiff:
Randolph Galarza
Defendant:
Thomas G. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelican Health Randolph LLC v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 3:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Pelican Health Randolph LLC
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
JOYCE v. MOORE, et al.,
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR, YVONNE CRAVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
