Cases 21 - 30 of 194
Robinson v. Chilton County System et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Frances Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Tate (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Neil Andrew Robinson
Defendant:
William A. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Clanton Police Dept. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Clanton Police Dept., Officer Wiseman and Officer Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Bullock Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Edward Dana Robinson
Defendant:
Bullock Correctional Facility, Alabama Department of Corrections, Nurse Vaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowder v. Robinson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00695
Plaintiff:
Joshua Crowder
Defendant:
Warden Robinson, Officer Coats and Officer Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
