Cases 21 - 30 of 135
COVINGTON v. HAWKINGS et al
as 1:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
MACUS COVINGTON and MARCUS COVINGTON
Defendant:
JOHNNY HAWKINGS, JUSTIN ELLERBEE, JASON GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOSKINS v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS et al
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, ROY COOPER, Patricia Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
MS. S. WILLIAMS, MR. HON BARRIER and MR. SHULER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. FRICK, et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
MR. J. FRICK and MS. S. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. ROBINSON
as 1:2021cv00933
Plaintiff:
GERMINIQUE STEPHON ROSS
Defendant:
SGT. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2021cv00771
Petitioner:
MORGAN GREGORY ROBINSON, JR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUNTER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2021cv00695
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
SHERIFF BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR., MAJOR SLATER, MAJOR CARLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Defendant:
MERCEDES T. FORDHAM, JOSHUA C. DENNIS, SERGEANT WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
DANNY LAMORE FORD
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
