Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Turner v. Heisner, et al.
as 24-583
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN GLEN TURNER
Respondent / Appellee:
R. A. HEISNER, BRYAN BIRKHOLZ and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe(s) 1-11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ronald Van Hook v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD VAN HOOK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, BEAVER, Magistrate Judge; Judge, MCKEE, District Court Judge;Judge and others
Zahara Ariel LLC et al v. Lionsgate Entertainment Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv04694
Plaintiff:
Zahara Ariel LLC and Jaryah Bobo
Defendant:
Lionsgate Entertainment Corporation, MRC II Distribution Company LP, Hot Sauce LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Barton v. Walmart Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05063
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and John and Jane Doe(s) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
