Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Gomez v. Utah Board of Pardons et al
as 4:2018cv00020
Petitioner:
Frederico Gomez
Respondent:
Utah Board of Pardons, Angela Micklos and Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2018cv00003
Petitioner:
Rudy M. Romero
Respondent:
State of Utah, Shane Nelson and Utah Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kozowski v. Nelson et al
as 6:2018cv00275
Defendant:
Deschutes County and L. Shane Nelson
Plaintiff:
Eric Kozowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Nelson
as 2:2017cv01314
Petitioner:
Robert Austin
Respondent:
Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marquez et al v. City of San Leandro et al
as 3:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Marquez and Christian Marquez
Defendant:
City of San Leandro, Matthew Barajas, John Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs v. Nelson et al
as 6:2016cv00759
Defendant:
Charity, Dpt. Dozier, Dr. Stephen Knapp and others
Plaintiff:
David Romeil Cobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalley v. Deshutes County Adult Jail et al
as 6:2016cv00530
Defendant:
Bend Public Safety Dept., Cannine Officer, Officer Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Smalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Nelson et al
as 6:2016cv00232
Defendant:
Deputy Barkhurst, Deputy Brown, Lt. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Darren James Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilson v. Nelson et al
as 6:2016cv00237
Defendant:
Deshutes County Adult Jail, Leslie Horner, Dr. Stephen Knapp and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Gilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostwick v. Deschutes County Jail et al
as 6:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Aaron P. Bostwick, Sr.
Defendant:
Deschutes County Jail and Sheriff L. Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
