Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Sharp v. Parks
as 8:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Gregory Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JUMBA BAKER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN JUMBA BAKER, BRITTANY MERCER, MATTHEW O'BRIEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MATTHEW LACKNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 23-13685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, TIMOTHY BROGLIO and US CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Sharp v. Broglio et al
as 8:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Timothy Broglio and Timothy Dolan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sharp v. Dolan et al
as 8:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Timothy Dolan, Archbishop Timothy Broglio and U.S. Conference Catholic Bishop
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 23-12930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHBISHOP TIMOTHY DOLAN, ARCHBISHOP JOSE GOMEZ VELASCO, ARCHBISHOP ALLEN VIGNERON and others
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan
as 23-12843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN
Sharp v. Dolan et al
as 8:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Archbishop Jose Velasco, Archbishop Allen Vigneron and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Black Rain Ordnance Inc
as 2:2023mc51238
In Re:
Black Rain Ordnance Inc. Fallout 15 Rifle Receiver-Frame CAL: Mulit SN BR006745, Benelli, S. PA. M2 Shotgun CAL:12 SN:N130200M, Aero Precision X15 Rifle CAL: Multi SN:X418915 and others
Petitioner:
Frank Mabry, VIII
Sharp v. Vance and Huffman LLC
as 4:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharp
Defendant:
Vance and Huffman LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
