Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharpe v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12783
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharpe
Defendant:
City of Detroit, City of Grosse Pointe Park, Anthony Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashton v. Okemos Public Schools et al
as 1:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
Pauline Ashton
Defendant:
Okemos Public Schools, Okemos Public Schools Board of Education, Dean Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sharpe v. City of Southfield et al
as 5:2020cv13172
Defendant:
Steven Hendricks, Christopher Don, Joseph Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Southfield, City of et al
as 5:2019cv11726
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, James Craig, Southfield Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Latausha Simmons
Hatcher et al v. Genessee County et al
as 2:2018cv11986
Plaintiff:
Imani Hatcher , De'Angelo Lansdown , Elvin Coleman and others
Defendant:
Genessee County, Robert Pickell and Jason Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Mackie et al
as 1:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeffery King
Defendant:
David Mackie, Jason Walters, Ginger Ross-Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
