Cases 1 - 10 of 568
Sharp v. Agape Baptist Church Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sharp
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School and Bryan Clemensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Transactly, Inc. v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Transactly, Inc.
Defendant:
Zebediah Sharp and Antony Neely
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sharp v. City of Springfield, Missouri et al
as 6:2023cv03269
Plaintiff:
Edward C Sharp
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Missouri and Springfield Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. USA
as 6:2023cv03212
Petitioner:
Curtis Sharp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Prudden v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Christina L Prudden
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Landrus et al v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv06066
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Landrus and Stacey Landrus
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. and Merry Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sharp v. CVS Health Solutions, LLC
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antoine B Sharp and Antoine B Sharp
Defendant:
CVS Health Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2021cv00479
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Renee Sharp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
C.H. v. Pattonville School District et al
as 4:2021cv00443
Defendant:
Melissa R. Benefield, Dee Byrnes, Michael Johannes and others
Plaintiff:
C.H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Menard, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00369
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Menard, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
1st Class Security
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
